Its Time To Abandon The Budget
Nov 30, 2009
The Need for Driver-Based Continuous Planning
Do you know the effects on your company if sales increase by 10%, 20%, etc.? Do you have the cash to fund the growth? What happens if a new competitor forces you to cut prices or a key supplier pushes through a significant cost increase? Especially with the ongoing economic crises all of us have been challenged to develop planning systems that react more quickly than ever before. Do you have the right tools to respond? This month I will challenge you to consider tossing out the traditional annual budget and instead move to a dynamic driver-based rolling forecast.
Successful companies of all sizes are facing pressures to make planning systems more immediate and responsive. The old way thinking was to sit down with the team in Q4 and come up with next year’s budget. Once finalized it was set in stone and loaded into the accounting system. That works fine if your business model is static and predicable. However, old ways of doing business are continuously
challenged by competitors, customers and the ongoing economic crisis.
The once a year Uber-process that produces a one size fits all scenarios budget is on the way out in favor of new approaches such as driver- based continuous planning, a discipline for developing plans and decision making promoted by such organizations as the Beyond Budgeting Round Table and planning gurus like Rob Kugel at Ventana Research.
Pulling from the literature, the table below presents the differences between budgeting,
the historical discipline, and driver-based continuous planning, another way of thinking promoted
in this article.
|
Budgeting VS Rolling Forecast |
||||||
|
Budgeting |
Rolling Forecast |
|||||
|
Timing |
||||||
|
Frequency |
Once/Year |
Often-Event Driven |
||||
|
Cycle Time |
Months/Weeks |
Days/Hours/Real Time |
||||
|
Time Horizon |
Annual |
Rolling |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process |
||||||
|
Versioning |
One size fits all |
Multiple Scenarios |
||||
|
Collaboration |
Submission/Approval |
Real Time Consensus |
||||
|
Deliverables |
Reports in Binders |
Decisions; Actions |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data |
||||||
|
Type |
Financial |
Financial & Operational |
||||
|
Inputs |
Many direct |
Activity/Driver based |
||||
|
Measurement |
Budget Variances |
Relative Change |
||||
|
Level of detail |
Precision Driven |
Relevant; Material |
||||
In contrast to traditional budgeting, driver-based continuous planning or rolling forecasts is all about
scenarios, lots of them. If you can’t predict the future, the next best thing is to set up
scenarios that let you explore how you might behave (or decide) if things are better
or worse or just different. Unlike budgeting where you care about who changed what
number, scenario analysis is about understanding what’s behind the numbers—the
most critical assumptions, volume and rate impacts, and especially what’s driving material
changes to the P&L and cash flow.
The deliverable of scenario analysis is actionable knowledge. By analyzing a specific
scenario and comparing it to a baseline case or other scenarios, the management team is
better able to evaluate best courses of action. Where there is an immediacy to the
issues—e.g. to proceed with a capital project or change pricing—the deliverable is decision
making. Because it’s decision and action focused, robust scenario analysis is the
most critical underpinning of continuous planning.
The functionality you need for effective scenario analysis goes beyond simple budget
versioning. Here are criteria to consider:
Real time feedback. when you change a value, all elements of the financial model—the
P&L, balance sheet, cash flow, financial ratios, performance metrics—should update immediately. For example, with driver-based continuous planning if a volume increase is being contemplated, you will know immediately the effects on revenue, materials, payroll, margins, etc.
Maintenance across scenarios. Rolling forecasts should support adding, modifying and deleting line
items across selected scenarios in a single operation. Calculation and update of financials after structure changes should take only a minute or two, at most.
Robust comparison at the line item level. Budgeting focuses on amounts in accounts. Driver –based continuous planning is about in depth comparison of scenarios and differences in values at any level of detail, especially at the line item level where the most significant inputs and modeling occur. Where the underlying data or links are available, scenario comparisons should reveal variances in
underlying unit activity drivers and rates.
Summary
Driver-based continuous planning provides companies with a strategic advantage by providing business owners real time actionable information that extends far beyond the capabilities of the traditional budget. My partners and I are experts at creating driver-based rolling forecasts. Call me and let’s discuss scrapping your budget and moving to a more strategic and action based system of planning for the future.
.
Contributions by Rand Heer and Ben Lamorte, Alight LLC.




